As you probably know, Directors and Partners in big-4 consultancies don’t have dyslexia. I must have caught mine from my children, I’m sure that must be the case. I certainly can’t have had it during education – none of my teachers mentioned it, although it would explain the rather bumpy ride I had at times.

Puzzle Head

But suddenly, aged 42 and with a successful career already behind me, I found myself sitting opposite an educational psychologist, who was explaining to me that I think differently from most people … something I knew, but had not fully understood.  A few years later, Stephen Spielberg had a similar experience describing it as, “The last puzzle piece to a great mystery that I've kept to myself.”1

I approached my new status as if a reformed smoker - threw myself into understanding what this meant for me, became the exec sponsor of the EY dyslexia network, a non-exec of the British Dyslexia Association, have written, spoken, been interviewed, counselled, coached and learned from many dyslexics.

I started with a disability view of dyslexia - but something quite different is very clear to me now - as leaders, we need to think differently about “different thinking” because neurodiversity can transform the fortunes of organisations.

“As leaders, we need to think differently about 'different thinking' because neurodiversity can transform the fortunes of organisations.”
What is neurodiversity?

Around 15% of people in the UK have some form of neurodiverse condition.  A non-exhaustive list might include dyslexia, autism (including Asperger's Syndrome)2, dyspraxia (also known as DCD), ADHD and others. The most common of these is dyslexia, which affects around 10% of people in the UK3.  For clarity, I am referring here to people at all levels of IQ - dyslexia, for example accounts for c13k graduates each year4  so I don't doubt you have hired some of these people recently.  Equally, these people also become our customers, suppliers and competitors - something we rarely consider. 

We are increasingly familiar with these terms in the context of educational difficulties and the Equality Act5  has brought these protected characteristics to the attention of our HR teams, in a disability context. The negative stereotype is set. 

However, there is now substantial evidence that many neurodiverse individuals possess unusually high levels of skill and unique capability in a number of areas and that is the focus of this article.

Is it a bug or is it a feature?

It turns out that if they exploit their strengths, some neurodiverse individuals can be very successful - Elon Musk, Charles Schwab, Jo Malone, Bill Gates, Anita Roddick, Steve Jobs, Richard Rogers, James Dyson, Bill Hewlett, John Chambers and Stephen Spielberg, to name but a few. 

Tesla Sign  Apple Sign
More analytically, Professor Julie Logan of CASS Business School6  completed research in 2011 that indicated that entrepreneurs in the UK are twice as likely to be dyslexic as the average, or three times more likely in the US.
So if all these successful people are affected if almost certainly must be a feature? So as leaders, wouldn't it be good if we built our organisations to fully exploit this latent pool of talent?

“Wouldn't it be good if we built our organisations to fully exploit this latent pool of talent?
Surely we are already doing this?

Unfortunately, whilst things are improving, most of our activity as employers accidently treats neurodiversity as a bug.  We design our organisations for neuro-typical people, measure everyone against the standard performance measures and wonder why fish turn out to be less good at climbing trees - a failure on their part perhaps?

Fortunately, most of us are trying to be good employers so we are going to act sympathetically towards the fish - look for adjustments we could make to their role, perhaps a new ladder etc.. So, whether intended or not, we have adopted the medical model of disability - it's a bug - a problem with the individual.

Fractal Head 2 
Not surprising then that the disclosure figures recorded by your HR department probably sit at around the 1-2% level vs the societal norm of 10-15%.  Does that mean the recruitment process filters us out at the door; that we feel unsafe disclosing; that the working environment is simply so inclusive that labels don't matter?  Experience says it is not usually the latter.

But perhaps the future looks brighter … 

Thinking about neurodiversity as a bug:

  • Diversity discussions are beginning to include disability (and hence neurodiversity).
  • Some organisations are beginning to adapt recruitment processes, updating policies and changing processes to make them more accessible
  • HR departments are increasingly providing access to “reasonable adjustments”, supported by the Access to Work scheme7 individuals to mitigate the downsides of disability.

There is an even better outlook …
Looking through the feature lens:

  • Programmes are beginning to emerge in a handful of leading companies that actively target some neurodiverse groups based on the “feature” mindset. 
  • According to the Harvard Business Review8  SAP, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Microsoft, Willis Towers Watson, Ford, and EY are all running active programmes in the US and others such as including Caterpillar, Dell Technologies, Deloitte, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, and UBS are tentatively beginning similar initiatives.
“The fact that programmes even exist is a very positive indication of direction of travel but progress is slow, fragmented and the neurodiversity gap is unlikely to close any time before the end of this century, if at all.”

The fact that these programmes even exist is a very positive indication of direction of travel but progress is slow, fragmented and the neurodiversity gap is unlikely to close any time before the end of this century, if at all. 

What is the business case for change
"Some neurodiverse people simply see things differently - that difference brings the leap of thinking that is needed to drive innovation, the spark of creativity or vision needed to transform a product or a service”

As always, the case for change will vary from organisation to organisation but arguably it spans:

  • Economic argument:
    10-15% of your customers - The value of this market is substantial as a consumer alone. What is your current market share with this group?  What are their unique needs, buying habits etc?
    War for talent - 67% of HR leaders9  believe the war for talent will remain a major issue. A compelling proposition for the neurodiverse could help address this. It could also boost brand awareness and value.
  • Strategic argument:
    Practical impact of different thinking - Some neurodiverse people simply see things differently - that difference brings the leap of thinking that is needed to drive innovation, the spark of creativity or vision needed to transform a product or a service.  What we offer varies, depending in the individual. Sometimes they offer strengths in things like pattern recognition, concentrated attention to detail, high levels of empathy or a range of other characteristics.  Employing these capabilities in the right way can transform the fortunes of an organisation.
  • Diversity & Inclusion Agenda:
    18% of working age adults have a disability. 
    By pension age, that number will have risen to 44%.  In working age, neurodiversity is one of the biggest groups - it spans gender, ethnicity, age, and sexual orientation so sits well at the centre of any diversity and inclusivity agenda.  What is good for the neurodiverse will also tend to have positive knock-on effects for a wider employee groups.
Chief Neurodiversity Officer

Fractal BrainIf I am right, then harnessing neurodiversity could provide organisations with a rich dividend. Smaller disruptive organisations are often self-selecting neurodiverse talent from the outset - their challenge will be to avoid growing in to cookie cutter shaped large corporates.

“Harnessing neurodiversity could provide organisations with a rich dividend”

For larger organisations, the key challenges will be: how to access and utilise this latent without breaking their already scaled business models; and how to achieve the level of cultural change needed to make this possible. 
Unsurprisingly, the biggest dividends will be the hardest to achieve and much of the change will need to be driven from or sponsored from the top of the organisation.  It's not going to be easy, but that shouldn't stop us trying.
Perhaps the rise of the Chief Neurodiversity Officer may be upon us!

Ok I believe you!  How do I get started?

There is no “one size fits all” answer, but a number of typical steps are included below.  One thing is certain - most organisations need some level of specialist advice when defining their approach.

Get the basics right

Ignore your company's disability statistics
“Better not tell anyone”, was my first thought, once I had a “label”.  Most people are reluctant to disclose an invisible disability. So don't trust the statistics HR have captured - assume 5-10% of your staff are probably keeping quiet about their condition and act on it.

Senior sponsorship
Senior sponsorship is vital. People who are actually involved and will spend the time needed to understand and champion the issue,  Even better, find someone who is affected by the issue in some way.  Of course, the perfect scenario would be someone brave enough to stand up and admit this applies to them too.

Make sure adjustments are easy for people to access
For many, their difficulties can be largely mitigated by the use of a few pieces of inexpensive technology.  Make this easy to access, a confidential process that does not require individuals to draw attention to their difficulties or seek budget from managers.

Support the creation of a staff network
 Where there is a lack of disclosure people are often reluctant to engage with corporate initiatives.  A staff network can help you engage with a collective as well as allowing them the autonomy to help themselves.  They will need budget and time though.

Awareness and education
Invisible disability is often complex and levels of awareness and understanding are generally poor.  Engage external experts to help educate or craft campaigns. 

The hard stuff

Neurodiversity Strategy
Do you simply want to be an inclusive employer or could Neurodiversity offer competitive advantage? Engage with experts and neurodiverse people - find out more and decide what role neurodiversity will play in your strategic talent agenda. 

Don't forget the Boardroom
How neurodiverse is your board?  Consider exploring the way your board thinks, makes decisions and whether it needs to add non-executive talent to gently challenge its approach.

  1. Interview with Quinn Bradley, on Friends of Quinn
  2. Estimate of the number of autistic people in the UK from the National Autistic Society, based on 2011 UK census and epidemiological surveys (2017 - Asperger represents perhaps 1/3rd of this number (source: Baird et al, 2006)
  3. British Dyslexia Association
  4. Prof Peter D Pumphrey FBPsS, 2006/7 - Analysis of UK domiciled 1st degree qualifiers with disability
  5. The Equality Act 2010, consolidates the Disability Discrimination Act 1998, Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Race Relations Act 1976.
  6. Dyslexic Entrepreneurs: The Incidence; Their Coping Strategies and Their Business Skill
  7. HM Government -
  8. Harvard business Review, May/June 2017, Robert D Austin and Gary P Pisano
  9. Navigating the future: HR 2020, Eversheds Sutherland and market research company Winmark